Learn more about the FIFA 19 login verification, the security. They try as hard as they can to reply within five business days, they're human. Sign in - Google Accounts.

Human
NoScript is Free Software (source code): if you like it, you can support its progress :)
Menghilangkan Human Verification

NoScript 10 'Quantum' resources

The NoScript Firefox extension provides extra protection for Firefox, Seamonkey and other mozilla-based browsers: this free, open source add-on allows JavaScript, Java, Flash and other plugins to be executed only by trusted web sites of your choice (e.g. your online bank).

NoScript also provides the most powerful anti-XSS and anti-Clickjacking protection ever available in a browser.

NoScript's unique whitelist based pre-emptive script blocking approach prevents exploitation of security vulnerabilities (known, such as Meltdown or Spectre, and even not known yet!) with no loss of functionality..

You can enable JavaScript, Java and plugin execution for sites you trust with a simple left-click on the NoScript status bar icon (look at the picture), or using the contextual menu, for easier operation in popup statusbar-less windows.
Watch the 'Block scripts in Firefox' video by cnet.

Staying safe has never been so easy!
Experts will agree: Firefox is really safer with NoScript!

V. 11.0.3 - Quantum Security for everyone!

If you find any bug or you'd like an enhancement, please report here or here. Many thanks!

Main good news
    o
  • Fixed XSS Filter prompt being oversized on the Tor Browser.
  • Work-around for the browser.i18n.getMessage() API in content scripts giving away browser's real locale on the Tor Browser.
  • Restored 'classic' pasted HTML sanitization feature, Now triggered by drag'n'drop too (thanks barbaz for patch).
  • Added 'Collapse blocked objects' option in Blocked Objects prompt.
  • Several new and updated translation, thanks to the Localization Lab / OTF NoScript Transifex project.
  • 'Override Tor Browser Security Level preset' option offers more flexibility to NoScript+Tor power users.
  • Several new and updated translation, thanks to the Localization Lab / OTF NoScript Transifex project.
More in the changelog..

Experts do agree..

03/10/2014, Edward Snowden endorses NoScript as a countermeasure against state Surveillance State.

08/06/2008, 'I'd love to see it in there.' (Window Snyder, 'Chief Security Something-or-Other' at Mozilla Corp., interviewed by ZDNet about 'adding NoScript functionality into the core browser').

03/18/2008, 'Consider switching to the Firefox Web browser with the NoScript plug-in. NoScript selectively, and non-intrusively, blocks all scripts, plug-ins, and other code on Web pages that could be used to attack your system during visits' (Rich Mogull on TidBITS, Should Mac Users Run Antivirus Software?).

Here are some thoughts:- The fan is somewhat noisy but not really an issue.- The current meter can measure down to milliamps and is pretty accurate so far.- The included software is pretty nice but more importantly to me, it was very easy to write a quick python script after connecting the device over USB (it shows up as a virtual serial port on your computer). There are only a handful of commands but basically anything you can do with the front controls, you can do remotely.- There is an on/off button for the output, and it can be controlled remotely. Bench power supply. Don't underestimate the importance of this. It took me just a few minutes to write a script to create a slow, periodic ramp signal jumping my 1 mV increments. I bought this unit for my test bench, and it has performed well.

11/06/2007, Douglas Crockford, world-famous JavaScript advocate and developer of JSON (one of the building blocks of Web 2.0), recommends using NoScript.

03/16/2007, SANS Internet Storm Center, the authoritative source of computer security related wisdom, runs a front-page Ongoing interest in Javascript issues diary entry by William Stearns just to say 'Please, use NoScript' :)
Actually, NoScript has been recommended several times by SANS, but it's nice to see it mentioned in a dedicated issue, rather than as a work-around for specific exploits in the wild. Many thanks, SANS!

05/31/2006, PC World's The 100 Best Products of the Year list features NoScript at #52!

Many thanks to PC World, of course, for grokking NoScript so much, and to IceDogg who kindly reported these news..

In the press..

  • CNET News: 'Giorgio Maone's NoScript script-blocking plug-in is the one-and-only Firefox add-on I consider mandatory.' (March 9, 2009, Dennis O'Reilly, Get a new PC ready for everyday use)
  • Forbes: 'The real key to defeating malware isn't antivirus but approaches like Firefox's NoScript plug-in, which blocks Web pages from running potentially malicious programs' (Dec 11, 2008, Andy Greenberg, Filter The Virus Filters).
  • PC World: Internet Explorer 7 Still Not Safe Enough because it doesn't act like 'NoScript [..] an elegant solution to the problem of malicious scripting' (cite bite)
  • New York Times: '[..] NoScript, a plug-in utility, can limit the ability of remote programs to run potentially damaging programs on your PC', (Jan 7, 2007, John Markoff, Tips for Protecting the Home Computer).
  • PC World's Ten Steps Security features using NoScript as step #6. (cite bite)
  • The Washington Post security blog compares MSIE 'advanced' security features (like so called 'Zones') to Firefox ones and recommends NoScript adoption as the safest and most usable approach. (cite bite)

I thought a hamburger was called “a hamburger” in the US 🙂By definition, of course, even in British English, a hamburger.is. a sandwich.

At any rate, there seems to be no suggestion in any of the Oxford lexicons (British or American) that sandwiches can’t be circular. Two pieces of bread with an edible filling in between is all you need to pass the test. I guess the CAPTCHA folks were hoping a robot wouldn’t be able to handle the subtletiesHaving said that, if you tried to order a hamburger by asking for “a sandwich” in Maccas, I think you would get, errrrrrrr, either a sandwich, served in the form of a square cut into two triangle, or a word from the security guard (depending on how strongly you argued the case, and whether it was after 1am). @Vincent Hafford as a bot you may, however, “jump” the cursor to the checkbox. A human would move it and not in a completely straight line either.I hate reCAPTCHA nevertheless. It’s based on assumptions that don’t work for the privacy and security conscious among us. First it’s embedded in an iframe.

Something my content blocker will block by default. Second it’s heavily using scripts. Well, guess what I have found myself solving more than half a dozen of these without being let in. And worse yet, when I resorted to solving the audio version there was a text that essentially told me I was a bot.

Why thank you. So these CAPTCHAs literally fail at the one thing they are meant to achieve: tell computer and human apart. Just wow.Oh and the fact that many of these images where you have to guess are specific to the culture where they are taken doesn’t it make easier.

Are traffic signs also street signs? Maybe in your native tongue they are, maybe they aren’t. Are churches buildings? According to reCAPTCHA not so much. Is this a lake or a river? How the heck am I supposed to know if you show me just one shoreline?